User: | Open Learning Faculty Member:
I did not have any difficulties summarizing my data in graphical form. I chose to utilize a bar graph and represent the data as mean number of individual clovers per 1 ft2 quadrant as a function of the level of shade present at each location. The bar graph neatly summarized the abundance of clovers at each location gradient. The graph is easily and quickly interpretable, this is why I chose to use a graph and not a table to present my data. When looking at the graph it is easy to see that it supports my original hypothesis that abundance would be highest in the “no-shade” location. The data did not reveal anything unexpected, however I did think that the abundance in the “partial-shade” would be higher. This has inspired me to consider and explore the effect of anthropogenic influences on the clover growth. I believe that the clovers are less abundant in the “partial-shade” location because the anthropogenic influences create competition for the clovers and introduce disturbances.
