User: | Open Learning Faculty Member:
The ecological resource that I selected is an eBook from the TRU library, titled: “Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance” by A. J. Underwood (1997). This is considered to be academic peer-reviewed material source, as the author is considered to be an expert in this field and the book has been peer reviewed. Further, many sources of supporting academic peer-reviewed references are used throughout this book.
Hyperlink:
https:// ezproxy.tru.ca/eds/ebookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXzU3MDM4Ml9fQU41?sid=4bd84846-9fb3-434f-a331-4bc1304e4be2@sessionmgr101&vid=1&format=EB&rid=1
Books are a bit tricky, they are often reviewed but aren’t the same peer review process as a scientific paper (anonymous, reviewers must make changes / justify in order for publication etc). However, if there is a peer review process for the book it would count. How do you know it has been peer-reviewed? If it has, I would probably call it Academic peer-reviewed review material. Perhaps you just missed putting the extra ‘review’ in your answer. Also, does it have citations?