The theoretical basis of my research project is to determine if Virginia creeper is negatively affected by the presence of anthropogenic activity. The central assumption is then examined in three areas; the first has largely been disturbed by anthropogenic activity as the natural area has been cleared and a road of sand has been built, the second area has moderately been disturbed by anthropogenic activity with some trees selectively removed, and the final area has not been disturbed anthropogenically.
The sanded area differs from the other two areas in that the Virginia creeper has more direct access to sunlight to promote growth and less competition with other plant species for nutrients. However, in this area, Virginia creeper growth can also be inhibited by sections of densely packed sand.
The second area presents the greatest opportunity for Virginia creeper to grow as selective logging clears the overhead canopy providing more sunlight and the removal of the trees presents more soil nutrients and less competition for the vine to flourish.
The final area that has not been disturbed by anthropogenic activity has provided Virginia creeper the greatest amount of time to naturally grow. I have observed that in areas of natural treefall, the Virginia creeper has opportunistically overtaken these areas and has used its adhesive tendrils to climb trees in other areas.
Three keywords: anthropogenic activity, woodland region, Parthenocissus quinquefolia