The tables I have created show the current keystone species and patches greater or less than 25. This will show you the present keystone species I have selected for value/harvest purposes present.
Category: Uncategorized
post 7
The Theoretical Perspective of my study is current state and relationship of this study area and many areas in different ecosystems. the affects of non-native species and disturbances have on ecosystems and traditional plants and medicine. I am hoping its an eye opener to land managers how we can address these problems. The data I have collected only confirms what is being stated by community that yes there is still traditional plant use and they are current.
Post 6 – Data Collection
The completion of my data collection went great and as expected! its definitely eye opening on the affect of non-native species and cattle grazing have on ecosystems. However using both traditional ecological knowledge and western science will benefit and revitalize this ecosystem but no less sustain what is left. The data collected is consistent with the value and importance information the community and elders provide.
Post 5 – Design Reflections
The time frame for my surveying and collection of data was completed by late summer with surveying done in four different stages with four different areas of interest. Each stage and area was ensured and timed with the seasonal plants and plant communities so they can be observed and recorded for my project!
For the collection of data I used a Compass, GPS, Ipad, PlantBook, Elson Tape
With the knowledge I’ve received from my community and elders tied to western science, I wasn’t surprised with my results. The disturbance of cattle grazing and non-native species was definitely noticeable and a problem. Which comes into question the management strategies we can use to get DPC (desired plant community) back or natural disturbances to bring the ecosystem back to succession then to climax community.
Post 4 – Sampling Stragegies
I have selected four areas and they have been chosen for its ethnobotanical potential for harvesting specific plant species utilized and managed by the surrounding indigenous community. I have provided a list of plant species that will be targeted in my survey and will be the keystone species surveyed. Each stratum has specific plant species to be located and recorded.
I will be recording this data and conduct cultural heritage resource surveys of cultural values, including ethnobotanical, wildlife, cultural and ethno archeological resources (hunting grounds, CMTS)
I will assess the current plant community and any potential impacts.
Post 3 – Ongoing Observation
For my study I have decided to analyze the ethnobotanical potential of the study area within my Nation. The survey will determine the current plant community, plant frequency and abundance. I will also collect data on the specific significant native species of interest; these are species that have been harvested for generations upon generations by the Syilx People.
Utilizing previous plant research in the community and knowledge of the study area as well with elder’s knowledge from the community I have targeted specific habitat types in the search for the selected keystone species identified. Elder’s knowledge indicated that plant species is well known and various of areas provide harvesting of medicine and foods for the indigenous people.
The Keystone species I have selected and four areas of study are..
1. Canopy Areas (Douglas-fir forest cover or Interior Douglas-fir Biogeoclimatic Zone).
Keystone Species Selected: Wild Onion, Soapberry, Red Osier Dogwood Field Mint, Tiger Lily, White Bog Orchid, Willow Spp., Spring Beauty, Saskatoon, Chocolate Lily, Paper Birch, Oregon grape, and Raspberry.
2. Grasslands (open areas or Bunchgrass Biogeoclimatic Zone)
Key Stone Species Selected: Saskatoon, Balsam Root, Sagebrush, Mariposa Lily, Big Sagebrush, Cactus, Field Mint, Fern-leaved Desert Parsley, Shrubby Penstemon Giant Wildrye, Yellow bell, Tarragon and Spring Beauty
3. Riparian Area
Key Stone Species Selected: Black Cottonwood, Cattail, Cows Parsnip, Douglas Maple, Field Mint, Bull Rush, Paper Birch, Red Osier, Dogwood, Raspberry, Saskatoon, Stinging Nettle, Water Birch, White Bog Orchid, and Willow.
4. Meadows (high-elevation opening in forest)
The meadow section of the footprint is surveyed specifically for spring beauty, due to the elders’ knowledge indicating that these areas were very productive harvesting sites. These areas were also surveyed later on as the canopy stratum with the same keystone species listed used to determine species frequency and abundance
Post 2 – References
Referring to my Post 1 and my interest in the CPC/DPC of my study area , as well as the current state of traditional foods/medicines valued by the Syilx People. I will be referring to my personal experience in Cultural Heritage Resources in the Forestry Industry, My Traditional Beliefs as a Syilx Woman, My Grandmothers and Grandfathers Traditional teachings of the Timxw (The Land) and incorporating my knowledge I’ve been studying in Western Science.
I will also refer to a couple of papers..
Wright, Justin P, Clive G Jones and Alexander S Flecker (2002). An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale. Ecosystems Ecology 132: 96–101
Barrett, S.w., and Arno, S.F. 1982. Indian Fires as an Ecological Influence in the Northern Rockies. Journal of Forestry 80 (10). Pg. 647-651.
Pilarski, Michael. 1987. Native American Ecosystem Interaction. Restoration Forestry. An International Guide to Sustainable Forestry Practices. Kivaki Press. Pg. 280.
Post 1 – Observations
Good Afternoon,
The area I have selected to observe is an area of interest/traditional value for the Syilx Nation People (Okanagan Nation) In the Syilx Nation we are fortunate to have very diverse ecosystems and low to high elevations. The area I have chosen is endangered and affected by natural disturbances and is very valuable for traditional medicines and foods.
In this study I will look at the four areas of interest, The Canopy (IDF), Grasslands, Meadow and The Riparian Area.
Possible questions for my study
- What is the Current Plant Community? What is the Desired Plant Community (CPC, DPC)
- What are the affects of Cattle grazing on this ecosystem?
- What is the current status of the traditional foods/medicines for the Syilx People?
Post 9: Field Research Reflections
I definitely experienced some issues with my experiment and was unable to course-correct due to changing field conditions. I collected my field data in August and then did not proceed again until winter. Big mistake!!! As my experiment was concerned with soil moisture content, and I did not measure this adequately in the summer, I was unable to get better data when the ground froze and was covered with 3 feet of snow.
As I worked through the experiment a little more, I think it would have been more interesting to assess biodiversity among shorelines more generally instead of specifically thinking about 1 species (Labrador Tea). This is my first time designing and implementing a field experiment and it has made me appreciate the breadth of knowledge and skills that it takes to collect sound data and then clearly communicate that to readers. I have always understood that developing ecological theory is a slow evolution that takes skill and patience. Performing my own experiment has made me realize that it is possible to do your own research and it doesn’t have to be complicated; however, the science can get really complex if you are interested in a higher level of research. Support and guidance would be key in next-level analyses.
Post 8: Tables and Graphs

I had a very difficult time trying to come up with a graph as I did a presence/absence quadrat and did not measure soil moisture content very precisely. I definitely should have gotten quantitative values for the soil moisture content instead of using a general description. I wanted to do a graph, but ended up making a table for lack of better ideas.
As I had to look long and hard at my field notes to decide what kind of graph or table to make, I ended up drawing a couple of unexpected conclusions about my data. Initially I was focused on simply the presence/absence of Labrador Tea but I noticed that biodiversity in general was higher within the wetlands than at the more extreme dry or flooded areas. Optimal soil moisture content promotes greater biodiversity. I also noticed that the Labrador Tea was the most prevalent species, indicating it may be a stronger competitor than a lot of other wetland vegetation. The general trend for biodiversity was unexpected, as I was only planning to make conclusions about optimal growth conditions for Labrador Tea.
Further exploration would entail more precise field measurements of soil moisture content. Of course sampling more quadrats and identifying more species would give greater detail if I wanted to look at biodiversity more generally.