Recent Posts

Observations

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


The Area that I have chosen is a inner city park called Canmore park located in Calgary. The area is approximately 15 hectares in size, and is a mix of grassland rolling hills and large groups of deciduous and coniferous trees. There were some magpies noted in some of the trees, as well as some animal tracks in the snow that appeared to resemble those of a rabbit or hair. Squirrels were noticed to be in the trees.

 

 

At the time of my field outing the weather was sunny clear skies and was -2 degrees Celsius. This area is a well-used park by many people in the community for cross country skiing and walking dogs. This time of the year the ground will be consistently covered in snow and ice and the majority of the trees will not have any leaves on them.

 

From my observations this day I noticed that despite the number of trees in the area there were not a lot of birds. I constantly have birds in my back yard year round. I would like to investigate the effects of urbanization and housing development of bird feeding and nesting habits when comparing this city park to urban city dwelling environments?

 

The other thing I noticed is that this area has signs of coyotes living in the area, but there are few other signs of food sources for them. How do coyotes in inner city neighborhoods thrive with lack of readily available food source?

 

As well I noticed that there were human tracks throughout the park, but there was distinct lack of activity in the more densely treed area of the park. Despite there being pathways through this area. In city parks such as this do residents preferer to walk in grass land areas as oppose to treed areas?

Post 2: Sources of Scientific Information

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


The article Estimating Carrying Capacity for Sea Otters in British Columbia published in the Journal of Wildlife Management is an example of academic peer-reviewed research material. 

The authors are professionals in their fields, associated with environmental consulting, the department of Fisheries and Oceans, and Malaspina University-College.The article contains in-text citations and appropriate references of citations. The authors include their methods and results of their study. Although dates of submissions and edits are not noted, the acknowledgements reference two anonymous reviews.

 

 

Gregr, E., Nichol, L., Watson, J., Ford, J., & Ellis, G. (2008). Estimating Carrying Capacity for Sea Otters in British Columbia. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 72(2), 382-388. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.tru.ca/stable/25097550

 

Blog Post 9 – Field Research Reflections

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


It was definitely an interesting class, one that has taught me much about ecological theory and it’s development. I would say my biggest challenge was not so much the field experiment – as I found that part fairly straightforward – but more the scientific wording throughout the assignments. Throughout my post-secondary education, I developed interests in subjects other than Sciences which switched my brain and mindset from being categorically logical (black and white) to more philosophical. So, heading into higher level BIOL classes for my BSc, I started having trouble wrapping my brain around the more complex scientific logic. This could perhaps explain why I am now working permanently in a Human History museum 😛 Nevertheless, this paper was really fun to make! It was my first time venturing in the world of Botany, so it was especially challenging. Field-wise, I probably had the most trouble identifying the mosses in my study areas. I did the best I could! I did have to make changes along the way, tweaks here and there to make it all come together nicely. I do think that perhaps the scientific wording in the assignments lead me astray from time to time. I spent a LOT of time trying to figure out how to categorizing my predictions and variables, but also making it work for the final report. That part was most confusing. But in the end, I hope that my work is up to standards!

Blog Post 8 – Tables and Graphs

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


Organizing my data was surprisingly easy to do. I focused on gathering data that was exactly relevant to my predictions. That proved to be very useful as it truly was a breeze to put together. The outcome was fairly similar to what I expected. I did expect there to be more moss in the areas with more sunlight. So that was accurate. Perhaps I should actually add that as a proper prediction in my final report. I have been slightly confused whether a variable should be used as a prediction in the introduction as well, or if that is completely different that should be used in the discussion only. It will all come together nicely though. Evidently, that is the purpose of these blogs.

My data definitely gave me ideas of further exploration. I have limited time, resources and knowledge, so it would absolutely be interesting to gather soil samples to calculate the moisture, for example. I was going to calculate soil moisture, however, winter creeped up on me faster than expected. The soil is frozen now. It would be interesting to see how moisture can affect the directional growth of moss. It could be good to see if moss grows in the same places and trees each year. Of course, it would be perfect to go much more in depth to see the relationship between which moss grows on which tree to see if that affects anything. It would be good to do some kind of wildlife survey, see if there are any moss-eating creatures that perhaps prefer moss on the south side of trees, leaving the northern side lush of moss. There are so many interesting research ideas that could grow from this introductory study that examines an urban legend.

Post One: Observations: Cates Park

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


The region I’ve chosen to study is Cates Park, a North Vancouver District municipal park. It is also known as Whey-Ah-Whichen, “Faces the Wind,” by the Coast Salish Tsleil-Waututh Nation, whose territory the park is situated.

📷Perimeter of Cates Park, courtesy: Google Maps

I first visited Cates Park for this study on Wednesday, November 28, 2018, at 1530h. The weather was overcast with light rain and no wind, so the sea state was flat and mirror-like. It was 8°C in late fall, and the tide was ebbing until 1640h, but this low was only 3.1m. Tidal variances in this area can be as high as 5m, but today the change was only about half a metre.

📷Looking east towards Port Moody Inlet, at the Roche Point flashing marker and layers of kelp at various tidal levels along the beach

Cates Park offers an ecosystem to which I am familiar, so the subsequent field observations will allow time and attention to more thoroughly analyze the Coastal Temperate Rainforest and its interactions with the sea. Other points of interest in Cates Park include Coast Salish cultural and environmental history, that Whey-Ah-Whichen is one of a very few seaside parks along the busy, industrial Vancouver shoreline, and is directly across the Burrard Inlet from an oil refinery. Local current events include ongoing environmental protests to stop an expansion of a pipeline that ends across the inlet. Tanker traffic is reported to increase 7 fold.

📷A tanker is escorted out of the Burrard Inlet

Whey-Ah-Whichen is a point of land at the meeting of the Burrard Inlet, Indian Arm and Port Moody inlets, with approximately 60 acres of forest, sandy and rocky seashore, and trails. To its north lies Dollarton Highway, a coastal road towards Deep Cove. The park is influenced by human factors, as visitors walk dogs and picnic with family, kayak and beach comb, and vehicles pass by both along the road and the waterway. The trails are maintained and occasional stairs lead from the forested pathway about 2-5m down to the beach.

The beach is composed of sand, rocks, pebbles and shell midden in some areas, and rises a few metres to meet the forest. A variety of kelp found on the beach include rockweed, turkish towel and sea lettuce. The forest has a gradient from the more sunlit seashore to shadier inland, including shrubs (red huckleberry, salmonberry, salal, wild rose, blackberry, common snowberry), trees (red alder, black cottonwood, broadleaf maple, western hemlock, western red cedar), ferns, grasses, mosses, lichens, bracket fungus, dandelion and ivy. There is a small freshwater stream halfway along the Malcolm Lowry trail and it dischargers on to the beach.

📷Field Notes pg 1
📷Field Notes pg 2

In terms of wildlife, sightings were sparse. Barnacles are abundant, and I expect to see more intertidal life closer to the new and full moons, where there will be more tidal exchange. I’m looking forward to spotting sea stars, shore crabs, harbour seals, small mammals and birds of prey in the future.

📷Barnacles abound

Potential Study Subjects:

Nurse logs are abundant on the coast, as trees that have either fallen or were logged support life for new seedlings. They decompose very slowly and allow their hosted trees to grow for decades and root around them. What nutrients do nurse logs provide, how much of a carbon sink are they, and which plants tend to use them more often as a bed for new growth?

📷Two western hemlock trees encompass a nurse log stump, with buttress roots that cascade toward the ground

 

Sea stars are a keystone species and top predator in their ecosystem. Recently their populations were devastated in a mass die-off from sea star wasting syndrome. Are there sea stars along in the intertidal zone of Whey-Ah-Whichen, do they show signs of the disease, and to what extent? How has this impacted their prey and other features in the intertidal zone?

The forest along the coast has evolved to thrive next to a salt water environment. What nutrients are brought from the currents of the inlet, how well do trees and shrubs thrive next to the ocean versus inland, and to what extent does the extra sunlight beside the beach help mitigate effects from salt or storms of the sea?

📷Western red cedar branches hang over the seashore

 

Coast Salish people have used this area for centuries, their culture thriving on the abundance from the ocean and the forest. Are there any culturally modified trees in the park, what portion of the tree was harvested and how well do the trees recover after bark or wood is taken? What food and medicine plants are in the park, and how have these been distributed by the Tsleil-Waututh cultural practises?

 

 

Blog Post 4

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


Results using the three sampling strategies on Snyder-Middleswarth Natural Area

Random Sampling

Total time to sample: 12hrs, 12 mins

% Error for Dominance

Most Common

Eastern Hemlock: 107 individuals, 15.9%

Red maple: 28 individuals, 17.1%

Least Common

Sweet Birch: 19 individuals, 14.3%

Yellow Birch: 17 individuals,  4.8%

Missed the striped maple and white pine entirely

Shannon-Wiener’s index of diversity for the community: 13.3%

Systematic Sampling:

Total time to sample: 12 hrs 12 minutes

% Error for dominance

Most Common:

Eastern Hemlock: 119 Individuals, 1.5%

Sweet Birch: 31 Individuals, 9.4%

Least Common:

chestnut oak: 11 individuals’, 50%

white pine: 2 individuals, 11.1%

Shannon Wiener’s index of diversity for the community: 6.6%

Haphazard Sampling:

Total time to sample: 13hrs

% Error for Dominance

Most Common Species:

Eastern Hemlock: 134 individuals, 5.4%

Yellow Birch: 34 individuals, 2%

Least Common Species:

Striped Maple: 8 Individuals, 157%

Chestnut Oak: 19 Individuals, 1.8%

Shannon Wiener’s index of diversity for the community: 6.6%

 

Comparing these three strategies it would appear that there is little meaningful difference in which one is most efficient with the time required to collect samples. Both the random and systematic sampling techniques requiring 12hrs and 12 minutes while the haphazard sampling required 13 hrs. In regards to the Shannon Wiener’s index of diversity for the community the haphazard and systematic sampling techniques only had a 6.6% error while the random sampling technique had a 13.3% error. The random sampling had relatively low % errors in the most common species (15.9% & 17.1%) and same for the most common species (14.2% & 4.8%); however, it missed two whole species present in the community. Systemic Sampling had low % errors in the most common species (1.5% & 9.4%), but with the least common species one high percent error 50%. Using Haphazard sampling had all percent errors under 6% except for in one of the two least common species a huge percent error of 157%. Due to these results I would probably deme random sampling the least accurate sampling method despite the haphazard sampling having one sample with 157% error, as it missed whole species and had the highest error Shannon Wiener’s index, while the Systematic Sampling was the most accurate on both accords. It seemed that the less abundant a species the more chance for high error, as they could be missed entirely. I would add that a stratified random sampling technique would probably have been the most accurate in this community as it seemed like some species were only present in small patches of land.

Blog Post 7 – Theoretical Perspectives

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


Quite honestly, my hypothesis is based purely on urban legends I have heard over my lifetime. The entire purpose of this introductory study is to see if there is any backbone to this saying. Finding those ecological processes/keywords is the goal of this research. Having read peer-reviewed articles on related subjects and having started my annotated bibliography, I’ve noticed a certain pattern. It is possible that:

  • sunlight is a factor in where the moss is present/absent as it generally is a factor in vegetation growth
  • soil moisture and moisture in general could also be a factor seeing as there are hypotheses out there which connect moisture levels with presence of moss on the northern face of trees
  • presence/absence of water source could be a factor. There are studies out there that demonstrate that water conductivity is a factor in moss growth patterns.

All this will be backed up in my paper with proper citations.

Blog Post 9

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


My field experiment was changed many times throughout my time enrolled in this course. I did not know much about ecology or plants prior to this course and my ideas were not easily conducted in a short time without outside assistance. I also struggled with time management; the weather was a large issue as every time I scheduled time to gather data, something in my personal life or the weather would interrupt. As I went back into my study site, I figured out how to gather data in a more efficient and accurate manner. Additionally, I read literature near the end of my research project – in the future I would suggest that others should do research or inquire about the best way to conduct their idea of research. Engaging in the practice of ecology has increased my appreciation for how scientists hypothesize ecological theories.

Blog Post 6 – Data Collection

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


I split each study zone in 5 quadrants and counted the trees/moss in each. I believe this means that I did 15 replicates in total. Although I am a bit unsure if replicates are defined the same way in a tabular experimental design. So far, I haven’t had any problems implementing my sampling design. The data seems consistent with the hypothesis. Perhaps I could find a relation between the amount of sunlight & soil moisture to moss growth/direction.

Blog Post 5 – Design Reflections

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


The sampling strategy was easy to follow. I just divided up the land, counted the trees in each quadrant, and then took a closer look at the moss and whether it was pointing north or not. I wasn’t surprised by the data, due to the sunlight, it seemed likely that the moss would grow quite a bit on the north side. I believe I will continue to collect data in the same way, it was very efficient. My greatest hurdle was to identify the types of moss. I have no background in Botany and very little experience identifying species. So it took me a while but I think (hope) I figured it out.