Recent Posts

Tables and Graphs

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


Table 1. Results from the nitrate and phosphate test done on water obtained from growth and no growth areas.

(-) indicates that the levels were too low to record, whereas (+) indicates levels signifying absolute presence.

Water sample Growth No growth
Nitrate test +
Phosphate test +

 

There was no trouble obtaining the data because the samples all followed a similar pattern, the no growth samples had more nitrates and phosphates and showed a reading in the photometer, whereas the growth areas had minimal amounts that were so minuscule that the photometer could not read the levels.

The results were as expected, where there was growth the levels of phosphates and nitrates were low because the plant uptakes the nutrients. Whereas, no growth samples had more nitrates and phosphates because the samples were collected far from the plant.

Data Collection

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


 

From the two visits, I got different samples of water from growth and no growth areas. 8 samples were collected each day, 3 no-growth and 5 growth samples.

I had no problems collecting the data, it was quite simple to collect the water samples in sterilized bags.

I have noticed that the water near Parrotfeather growth is a lot cloudier than the samples obtained where there was no growth.

Blog Post 1 Observations

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


The areas I chose for my research are two ditches located by the road outside 4791 Tolmie Rd in Abbotsford, British Columbia

The site was originally visted on July 4th 2018

Time: 12:30pm

Weather: Sunny with minimal clouds

Temperature: 32°C

The ditches had water in them but they were covered with Parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum). 

Parrotfeather is an invasive aquatic plant that forms a complex subsurface canopy.

The three hypothesis are:

1-Parrotfeather grows rapidly in stagnant water.

2-Wherever Parrotfeather grows, the nitrate and phosphate levels are lower compared to where it does not grow.

3-As the population of Parrotfeather increases, the population of the surrounding plants decreases.

The prediction is that as the population of Parrotfeather increases, the levels of nitrate and phosphate decrease in the water. Low levels of nitrate and phosphate levels in the water lead to the population of the other plants to decrease. Wherever there is Parrotfeather growth, the growth of other plants will be negatively affected therefore there will be lesser population of any other plant.

 

Post 2: Sources of Scientific Information

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


Danielle Kinsella, November 17th 2018

The source is an online paper titled Integrative biomechanics for tree ecology: beyond wood density and strength from the Journal of Experimental Botany. The paper was retrieved via Google Scholar.

Citation:

Fournier, M., Dlouhá J., Jaouen, G., and T. Almeras. 2013. Integrative biomechanics for tree ecology: beyond wood density and strength. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(15): 4793–4815 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert279 (accessed November 11, 2018)

It is classified as Academic, peer-reviewed review material because of the following factors:

Academic material

  1. The information was written by experts in their field, the affiliation of authors with several large institution and universities in France such as AgroParisTech (Paris Institute of Technology for Life, Food and Environmental Sciences), INRA (agricultural science research institution, and the CNRS Centre national de la recherche scientifique.(National Centre of Scientific Research)
  2. The article information includes in-text citations, stating the authors last name and year published, in reference to the bibliography.
  3. The article has a bibliography at the end indicating sources of information used in the paper.

Peer-reviewed, academic material

  1. The source has been reviewed by at least 1 referee before publication, indicated by Revised dates and acknowledgement to an anonymous reviewer.

Received 19 March 2013; Revised 18 July 2013; Accepted 22 July 2013

At the end of the acknowledgements is the sentence: “We are also grateful to Gail Wagman who improved the English, and to an anonymous reviewer for stimulating comments.

Academic, peer-reviewed review material

  1. There is no Methods or Results section in the article, therefore, it is not research material it is review material. Several experiments from other research papers have been compiled into the review paper.

Therefore, the paper is classified as academic, peer-reviewed review material.

Post 1: Observations

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


Danielle Kinsella, November 16th 2018

The area I have decided to study falls within the Garry Oak ecosystem at Pipers Lagoon Park in Nanaimo, BC. My reconnaissance of the area was November 11th 2018 at 2:55 pm. The weather was sunny with a bit of wind, the temperature was a warm 8°C fall day.

The landscape consists of a tied island attached to Vancouver Island by a ~350m long tombolo. The tied island is 275m long in the NW/SE by 200 m NE/SW (see Figure 1). Together, the landforms create a large lagoon which undergoes drastic water level changes every day with tidal movement. The north side of the park consists of rocky bluffs, however, elevation does not exceed 20 m (see Figure 2). The tombolo has relatively flat topography, while the east side receives direct waves.

Figure 1: Satellite image of study site. Green outline indicates the park boundary and extents. Created using Google Maps.

Figure 2: View of Pipers Lagoon facing North.

The area ranges from forested areas, grasslands with scattered trees and shrubs, to intertidal zones with dense aquatic vegetation. There are a variety of vegetation species within the park, however, the only animals sighted were ducks, geoducks, seagulls and a bald eagle. Along the tombolo is largely grassland with shrubs, with a few Garry Oak and young Arbutus trees. The main portion of the park is forest consisting of mainly Garry Oak, Douglas fir and Arbutus trees. Several shrubs occur along the forest floor as well as some invasive species such as Himalayan Blackberry and English Ivy.

Possible Subjects and Questions

1. What daily fluctuations do the organisms in the intertidal zone undergo each day and how does it affect their internal nutrient composition?

Identifying and studying the species located here, you can determine their relative abundance. This method of analyzing the community may indicate which species is more adapted and able to survive harsher conditions. Another possibility would be to analyze the salt content in different species of plants.

Figure 3: left photo: sea asparagus, right photo: below surface geoducks.

2. Are the invasive plants a threat to the keystone species in this ecosystem? Do they affect all other vegetation species surrounding them?

While observing the Garry Oak tress I noticed along the ground some Himalayan Blackberry plants. They were growing between a young and old Garry Oak (see Figure below), and nearby was a juvenile arbutus tree. English Ivy was also observed along the floor of more dense forest, where it slowly crept up Garry Oak and Douglas fir tree trunks.

Figure 4. Left photo: Invasive species near Garry Oak. Right photo: young arbutus found nearby.

3. Does the spatial distribution of tree species vary along the perimeter of the tied island?

The north side experiences direct wind from the ocean, whereas the south side is protected from harsh winds and does not experience harsh waves. Also, the north side is rocky bluffs where it is too steep for several trees to grow. Are the two areas affected differently by sunlight and/or the physical environment surrounding them, and does it affect which tree will grow there? The three distinct tree types are: Garry Oak, Arbutus and Douglas fir. Walking around the park it appeared there were many places with only a single tree species, or with several.

Figure 5. Left photo: Southwest side of tied island. Right photo: Rocky bluffs on North side of island.

Figure 6. Trees growing out from rocky hill. Left photo: Garry Oak. Right photo: large Arbutus tree.

Figure 7: Young Douglas-fir tree.

Field Notes:

Blog Post 8: Tables and Graphs

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


When it came to creating my graph for my final results of my field data I really wanted to represent my data in a way that was very straight forward and clear. This was important for me to do because I wanted the “reader” to be able to look at my graph and quickly understand the results that were concluded. Because I did 5 different point count stations that all had varying degrees of urbanization I wasn’t able to show this data through a line graph. So, instead I decided the best way for me to present the data was through a simple but very useful bar graph. The final data was not exactly what I had predicted it to be. I had predicted that I would find the greatest number of birds using an area that had the most shelter (no urbanization) compared to areas with little shelter (fully urbanized) or areas with intermediate amounts of shelter (intermediately urbanized). This did not actually end up being the case. Instead the data suggest that the largest number of birds using an area were the intermediately urbanized areas. These were the areas where there was about half forest area and half urbanized areas (lawn/house area). Because these areas had some urbanization, there were bird feeds and even bird baths present. This seems to be a favorable circumstance for the birds; they are provided shelter through the trees, as well as food and water from the provided baths and feeders.

Another thing that caught my eye when examining the data was the surprisingly high amount of birds using the area that was just lawn space. This is the only area that has complete urbanization. No trees, all man-made shelter areas and lots of bird feeders around. This area had almost the same number of birds using the area as did the areas of all forest. Once again though, I’m curious if this is due to the large amount of bird feeders that area around the completely urbanized area.

One other thing that I did wonder about when looking at my final data was if the smokey weather had anything to do with the lack of birds I observed under those conditions. The days of heavy smoke from the wildfires was on the same day that I went to the point count station 1 and 2. At location 1, had observed 3 fewer birds from the previous times I visited the site and at location 2, I once again observed 3 fewer birds than previous times I had visited. This will be something I take into consideration when composing my final project.

Ecology Blog Post 3

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


After repeated visits to the Art Gibson Memorial Park I have decided to study the correlation between soil pH levels and the presence of undergrowth. The park is for the most part dominated by an old canopy of coniferous trees underneath which there is minimal undergrowth, but there are small areas of new growth with different species of trees where there is plentiful undergrowth. I have decided to investigate 2 plots approximately 30x50m one belonging to the old growth and another the new growth. There are many factors that could cause the presence or lack thereof of undergrowth, soil moisture, amount of shade cast by the canopy or the pH levels of soil. The park belongs to the biogeoclimatiic  zone ICHdw1 which is supposed to be a typically moist so I doubt there being a change in moisture between such little distance in the two research plots. I hypothesize that there is a correlation between the presence of undergrowth and soil pH, I predict that there will be a positive correlation with higher levels of soil pH  being present in the areas of new growth. The response variable should be the presence of undergrowth and the explanatory variable should be soil pH levels the former being a categorical variable and the latter being a continuous variable.

Blog Post 4

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


For this assignment, I used a distance-based method to compare three sample placement techniques (systematic, simple random, haphazard) within the Snyder-Middleswarth natural area. The systematic technique was the most time-efficient strategy at 4 hours 7 minutes, followed by the haphazard technique at 4 hours 24 minutes, and the simple random technique at 4 hours 39 minutes.

The two most common tree species were Eastern Hemlock and Sweet Birch, while the two most rare tree species were Striped Maple and White Pine. The percentage of error for each species is shown in the table below:

Species Systematic

% error

Simple Random

% error

Haphazard

% error

Eastern Hemlock -9.6 53.4 -14.4
Sweet Birch -47.2 35.2 9.6
Striped Maple -49.1 -100.0 -54.3
White Pine 321.4 337.0 -100.0

Systematic sampling was the most accurate technique for Eastern Hemlock at -9.6%, while haphazard sampling was the most accurate technique for Sweet Birch at 9.6%.  Accuracy substantially decreased as species abundance decreased. Some sampling techniques failed to capture the presence of the rarest species: the simple random technique failed to detect Striped Maple, while the haphazard technique failed to detect White Pine. Detection failure, combined with the remaining data for the rarest species, made systematic sampling the most accurate technique for those species.

For most species, systematic sampling was the most accurate technique. However, when looking at accuracy for individual species, frequency and distribution would also have to be considered when trying to identify the most accurate sampling technique for each.

Blog Post 2

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


The source I chose for this post, “Soil bacterial communities exhibit systematic spatial variation with land form across a commercial potato field”, is an Academic, peer-review research paper. I found this paper online published by ELSEVIER Which is a major publisher for scientific content that uses peer review. The first three people on the paper Neupane, Goyer and Zebarth all have PhDs, and either belong to a university or work for the government of Canada, so I would assume they have the required expertise in the field. The paper includes a bibliography, in-text citations, a methods section and a results section. All these features indicate an academic peer reviewed research paper.

Link to the article:

https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0016706118305056/1-s2.0-S0016706118305056-main.pdf?_tid=67ab562e-2873-4f3e-9ba7-2fd0377f7eba&acdnat=1539814414_c4e67f76788968e2bc11d4858d7ea5e9

Ecology Blog Post 1

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


Observations of Study Area:

The area I have decided to observe is Art Gibbon’s Memorial Park. Art Gibbon’s Park is a wooded, flattish city park in Nelson BC. The park is rather large around the size of one and a half football fields.  at the top of the Rosemont neighbourhood, a neighbourhood that spreads over the side of a large hill at the top of town. The park is mainly covered by large trees that appear to be Cedar, Hemlock and Douglas Fur for the most par. Under these large trees there seems to be minimal undergrowth present. There are a few patches of smaller, thinner white trees, and where they grow the floor is carpeted in moss and small plants. There were minimal signs of fauna present, the park was quiet with no birds nearby, and only a few glimpses of squirrels off in the distance. I visited the park a few times since the 1st of October at 10:00am, 12:00pm, and 5:00pm, in both cloudy and sunny weather.

Questions:

  1. Is there a difference in soil quality between areas of new growth and area’s with the established canopy?
  2. Are there patterns in the distribution of the different species of trees due to competition?
  3. How does snow fall interception relate to the species of trees