Recent Posts

Post Four: Sampling Strategies

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


In the virtual forest I chose to use Distance Based sampling.

Systematic sampling was the most efficient in terms of time spent sampling, but only by about 15 and 30 minutes respectively.

The actual densities varied widely with my estimated data from sampling. Haphazard sampling was the most accurate sampling strategy for common species, with an average error margin of 12.5%. The most accurate for rare species was Systematic sampling, with an average error margin of only 2.3%. My results showed that accuracy was better for more common species, which was not surprising. Although not recorded in the table below, I noticed that systematic sampling showed closer results for the species that were neither common nor rare. Because of wide ranges in error margins, it would be ideal to sample more than 24 points for a more accurate estimate.

 

Tree Species Actual Density Distance Systematic % error Distance Random % error Distance Haphazard % error
Most Common Eastern Hemlock 469.9 516.5 9.9 368.2 21.6 399.3 15
2nd Most Common Sweet Birch 117.5 42.3 64 108.3 7.8 105.9 9.9
Least Common White Pine 8.4 8.5 1.2 21.7 158 0 100
2nd Least Common Striped Maple 17.5 16.9 3.4 32.5 85.7 8.1 53.7
Estimated Time 4h15m 4h29m 4h44m

Blog Post I: Observations

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


(03/17/19; 12:00-15:30; 6° Celsius; no precipitation; scattered clouds; light wind from the west)

(03/24/19; 13:00-14:30; 11° Celsius; no precipitation; clear sky; light wind from the west)

(03/31/19; 12:30-14:30; 5° Celsius; light rain; full cloud cover; light wind from the west)

Study Location:

The area I have chosen for my field project is located at the confluence of the Peace and Halfway Rivers in north eastern British Columbia, approximately 46 kilometres (km) southwest of the city of Fort St. John, B.C. (Figure 1A).  The field site has a perimeter of 2.33 km, an area of 0.34 km² and an average elevation of approximately 430 metres (m); all topographical measurements were quantified using Google Earth (Figure 1B).  An aerial photograph of my field site was provided to me by a friend conducting a flyover survey and was taken on March 31, 2019 (Figure 1C).  An unpaved pullout south of the Highway 29 bridge crossing the Halfway River will serve as a staging area and the northern-most boundary of any potential surveys in my field study. The western boundary of the study area extends southwest along the eastern bank of the Halfway River’s main channel, meandering south toward its confluence with the Peace River.  The eastern extent of the study area follows southeast from the staging area, extending along the eastern channel of the Halfway River’s boundary with a a riparian area until it connects with the Peace River.  These boundaries create a somewhat triangular survey area that includes both the Peace and Halfway Rivers, a floodplain, an historic floodplain and a forested riparian area (Figure 1 B).

Relatively easy access, the confluence of two rivers, diverse substrates and terrain as well as readily apparent gradients of vegetation and evidence of animal life drew me to this study site (Figures 2A – Figure 2D).  For example, I observed loose rocky substrates, fines, sand and gravel bars while other substrates remain covered by ice.  There is large woody debris distributed across the floodplain and historic floodplain in which a variety of grasses, willows and small poplars dominate, while the riparian vegetation is characterized by large, well entrenched pine and balsam poplar trees.  The south bank of the Peace River towers over the Halfway River and the confluence, with an elevation nearing 500 m.  The south bank is very steep and is dominated by pine trees with significant erosion occurring, I often observed rock, earth and ice falling to the river below. Over the course of three visits I have directly observed a variety of vertebrates (e.g., Mule Deer, Canada Geese, swans, dabbling ducks, a Bald Eagle, a rabbit, a sharp-tailed grouse), their tracks (e.g., elk, deer, wolf, coyote, rabbit, goose, raven), droppings (e.g., deer and goose) and nests (e.g., Bald Eagle, Bank Swallow)  as well as some invertebrates (e.g., spiders, mosquito larvae).

Three questions:

  1. Outside of the riparian area, several small pine trees have grown in highly localized spots along the east bank of the Halfway River’s main channel.  How does vegetation vary across my study area, and what is different about the area in which these pine trees have grown?
  2. Is there a correlation between river level/discharge and the presence (or signs) of animal species I have observed at the confluence?
  3. Is there a correlation between river level/discharge and presence of mosquito larvae that I have observed at the confluence?

 

Blog Post 9 – Field Research Reflections

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


My time spent on this research project gave me a greater understanding of how to conduct and implement a research study. It also allowed me to see why ecology is such a diverse field to study.

During my field research study I did encounter a couple of issues. A few of the issues I observed were prior to initiation of the field study and I was able to make the alteration to the designs. The one issue I ran into in the field study on site was as the morning went on the number of people that were at the park increased which increased the amount of disturbance occurring while I was trying to observe all the birds present. After the first day of sampling I decided to decrease the amount of time I spent at each survey location to decrease the chance of being interrupted by a third party.

Engaging in the practice of ecology has given me a greater appreciation of those who put the effort into all these studies on ecology. Before I came into this class I never conducted my own field experiment. I had only ever completed assessments on projects following standardized procedures for permitting purposes.

 

Post 2: Sources of Scientific Information

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


Genetic diversity of seagrass seeds influences seedling morphology and biomass, in the journal, Ecology, is a research article. Anne Randall Hughes and Torrance C. Hanley specialize in marine and environmental sciences. Forest Schenck specializes in marine biology. Also, Cynthia G. Hays, specializes in biology. All of the authors have expertise in this field, in-text citations were included, and there was a bibliography, which means the article is an academic source. The source was reviewed by two referees before publication, indicating it is peer-reviewed material. Finally, it contains a “Methods” and “Results” sections, which means it is a research article. Therefore, this article is academic, peer-reviewed, research material.

https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.tru.ca/stable/44082215?seq=7#metadata_info_tab_contents

Post 1: Observations

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


The study area is in Mount Currie, approximately 8 km north of Pemberton, on Nelson Bar Ranch. The area is approximately 7 hectares in size. 1/3 of the perimeter of the area is touching the Birkenhead River. A major portion (80%) of the area is an open grass field which contains 10 horses. There are forested areas, which have conifers such as cedar, and deciduous such as birch and cottonwood. Vegetation also include shrubs, and mosses.

Nelson Bar Ranch

The site was visited 09-04-2019, in the spring, from 1500 – 1704. It was sunny with some clouds, but it was mainly clear. It was 14 degrees centigrade with a slight breeze blowing west.

I observed the east and west edges of the field near the river. The west edge of the river mainly contained deciduous trees, with one cedar sapling found in the study area. There was leaf debris from the edge of the field to the edge of the river. All the shrubs were shorter than 5 feet 6 inches (shorter than me). The area is a ranch, so horses and humans occupy the area daily. Moss was present on the west side and was mixed in with the grass. There was little to no moss on the living trees and debris. I heard 4 different bird calls in this study area.

West, vegetation layers

West, leaf debris

West, cedar sapling

The east edge contained a mix of deciduous and coniferous trees. The ground was softer than the soil of the west edge. More trees were present on the east edge, which provided more canopy cover. Leaf debris covered the whole ground area. Grass didn’t seem present, even when moving some leaf debris. Moss was present on living trees as well as branch and log debris. In this area, the shrubs were taller than 5 foot 6 inches (taller than me). Fungi was only found on the east side. While on this edge of the field, I only heard one bird call.

East, cedar layer

East edge, riparian layer

East edge, cedar layer meeting riparian layer

East edge, fungi

My three questions are:

  1. Is moss more present in areas with less human disturbance or is it more related to the habitat? Moss was more present in the area farthest away from human contact, but also the ground was more moist and there was more canopy cover.
  2. Does the amount of canopy cover relate to whether fungi is present or absent? Or is it related to moisture level? The east side had more canopy cover, and the ground was softer and more moist.
  3. Is the west edge of the field a better habitat for birds? If so, what makes it better? A variety of bird calls were heard on the west edge, while only one was heard on the east edge.

Post 1: Observations

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


Post 1: Observations

Posted on April 10, 2019 by caudia

Cathy Audia

April 8, 2019

This study is being conducted at the Courtenay River Estuary which is designated as a City of Courtenay Park. The site is being visited on April 8, 2019 at 1830 hours.  The weather is overcast with little wind and the temperature is 9 degrees centigrade. The estuary is located approximately one kilometer from downtown Courtenay.  The Estuary is the area where the Courtenay River flows into the Pacific Ocean sitting at 49.68 degrees North and 124.99 degrees West. The shoreline of the estuary is approximately 1 km across with the depth changing from as little as 5 meters wide to 500 meters during low tide.

There is a bank from the edge of the beach up to the grassy plateau sloping at approximately 10% grade.  The estuary is made up of several different types of vegetation. Seagrasses and seaweed are found in the muddy flats with increasing amounts of seagrass closer to shore and decreasing amounts of seaweed closer to shore. The shoreline consists of a mixture driftwood, rocks, seagrasses, and various plants that appear to be more typical to be found on dry land than under water. There is a sprinkling of deciduous trees along the top of the bank.  It appears most of the native trees have been removed to create a paved walkway and a small airport which is located steps from the estuary.

Some of the flowers and flowering shrubs along the shoreline have flowers blossoming at different rates. As it is early spring, and vegetation started growing within the past 3 weeks.  The flowers that receive unobstructed sun are further along in their flowering cycle.

I pose the following 3 questions;

  1. I observe many of the reed-like plants have died in the tidal flats. Leading me to question did they die due to poor growing conditions, or do they die off seasonally. I discovered some of the same reed-like plants on the shore edge that appear healthy. I will continue to observe their growth as spring progresses.
  2. I also note an interesting pattern in the sand. It is circular shaped with greyish sand that was noticeably different then the surrounding beige sand.  The circle has 4 an imprint in it with arms similar to a starfish shape and in the center is a hole.  I suspect there must be some type of shellfish living underneath this hole. I will continue to look for clues to the source of this pattern.
  3. I also notice there are only 2 seagulls on the estuary side and 6 ducks in the small inlet. As the estuary is known as a good place to view a variety bird I wonder if I will see if more birds as the season changes.  

Blog Post 6 – Data Collection

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


So far, I’ve collected five replicates. The most significant issue that I’ve faced in collecting the data is human influence. I’m collecting the data on a fairly busy trail which sometimes hosts groups of children as such when I’m collecting data and there is a group of children, birds will typically stay away from my sampling location.

One pattern I’ve noticed thus far is that bird activity seems to increase when temperatures are lower. One hypothesis could be that they require more energy (i.e., food) and thus are more active to find food to stay warm.

Blog Post 9

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


Looking back on this research project it did not turn out exactly as I was hoping it would, but the experience of dealing with the complexity of implementing the research in this field did give me a large appreciation for all the effort that has to go into any study in the field of ecology. Lab work in general you get a fair share of hurdles to jump over but there’s so many confounding variables and factors to take into account when working in the field. I wish I’d had more of the tools I’ve read about for testing soil pH, like the onsite probes you can use in the field rather than having to make solutions and test it with a meter in the lab. That said having changed the ratio of the soil water solutions I was testing and sieving out the organic mater in the samples did at least allow me to collect reliable data where I was more sure about the readings being the true values, but if I’d had one of the probes I could have taken more samples.

Blog Post 8

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


I did not have too much difficulty organizing my table or graph. For the table I had sample #, pH as read off a meter, pH as found off pH strips, and the presence or absence of underbrush as the different columns. For the graph of my data I graphed the presence of underbrush as teh dependent variable against the soil pH as read off the pH meter. The graph felt a little funky for me since the presence of underbrush is a categorical variable. I assigned 1 to be presence of underbrush and 0 to be absence of underbrush so the data looked like a Bernoulli distribution to me. When a best fit line was placed in on the scatter plot there appeared to be a slight negative relationship, but when the means of each of the two sites were calculated they were so close together only differing by a value of 0.066 pH that without being able to evaluate the data using p-values, since I can’t assume normal distribution, I have to accept the null hypothesis. This outcome is unexpected as I went in thinking that soil pH was probably an influencing factor on the distribution of the underbrush, but there are definitely other factors that could be the cause of this pattern. If I were to explore this topic further I would look into those other factors like interspecies competition, shading, soil type, and soil moisture.

Blog Post 5: Design Reflections

User:  | Open Learning Faculty Member: 


While collecting the data, some difficulties faced were the number of people on the trail and attempting to identify the number of individuals for each species. On the first point, when making observations there were times when tour groups of children would approach the area to observe birds. Although they attempted to remain silent, the sheer number of people in one location made it that the birds were not nearing the area. Approximately five minutes after the groups would leave, the birds would return to this area. To address this issue, my sampling design will be modified such that if there are touring groups in the area, I would wait five minutes after the group has left before beginning the data collection.

On the second point of identifying the number of individuals for each species, unless the individuals are tagged it is challenging to determine the exact number of individuals there are for each species. To address this issue, I decided that species diversity would be assessed for this study rather than abundance.

The data collected was slightly surprising in that the abundance of individuals for each species was greater in colder weather. The diversity of species was similar in colder temperature as compared to warmer temperatures. Despite these observations, only five replicates have been collected thus far, it will interesting to see how/if things change.