Reudink, Post 9: Field Research Reflections

Creating a field experiment, carrying it out, analyzing the results, and then interpreting them in a scientific report was an informative experience. Since I have done my entire degree online, I have learned a lot about how different discoveries were scientifically validated but I had not previously had the opportunity to experience this process for myself. I had difficulties in conceiving a good design, initially; however, having a “field expert” on-call, there was always a solution to my issues. One of the largest changes I made was in my sampling design. I went from considering a randomized square plot design to a systematically selected circle plot design. The systematic selection ensured all of my plots were far enough from each other to be independent, while the circle plotting was just plain convenient (i.e., stand in the middle of the circle plot and measure whether specimens are within the radius of the circle).

I have two regrets after completing my study. Firstly, I wish I had the ability to wait for better weather before gathering my data. I am quite certain that the snowy conditions confounded my results. Secondly, I would have liked to fit my data to a model and see whether my correlations were statistically significant. I tried an ANOVA regression and a linear regression; however, the sample size was so small that p values were above 0.6… If I had better statistical know-how, I’m sure I could have found a better model to fit my data to and more accurately measure significance.

Engaging in my own ecological enquiries gives me a deeper appreciation for the work and time that goes into the research that contributes to ecological theory. Just like catching the right camera shot in nature documentaries, collecting good data for ecological science is time-consuming and difficult. This process has also given me an increased sense of curiosity and wonder while I navigate through nature. Who knew science is right around my back door!